In my little book How to Change the World I use the PDCA model to describe the fact that it is useful to have an iterative approach to http://mechajournal.com/alumni/customessays-ws/12/
resume writers adelaide
someone write my paper for me
visual analysis essay papers for sale
viagra farmacia dr simi
sample resume memberships
malaysia online sale female viagra
buy assignment online
comparison essay prompts
top admission paper proofreading service online
sat essay examples 12
high school senior thesis outline
ideas for psychology research paper
university writer sites uk
Sitemap essay typer
essay typer online
programs to make presentations
get essay written
best dissertation writers
change management and continuous improvement.
Some people prefer PDSA over PDCA because it “emphasizes learning over inspection”.
Some people prefer OODA over PDCA because they believe the PDCA model is about “analysis of complicated situations”, while the OODA loop suggests “sensing of complex environments”.
Some people prefer YMCA over PDCA because it supports a “healthy body, mind and spirit”. (Actually no, I just made that up.)
And then we have Build-Measure-Learn and Inspect-Adapt and Probe-Sense-Respond and all those other simple models that tell us to try things iteratively while learning from feedback.
I sometimes prefer LMAO because all models are wrong, though some are useful. And to me the useful ones are those that help me to change the world and enjoy my job at the same time.
If you care too much about the differences between PDCA vs. PDSA vs. OODA vs. BML vs. PSR vs. YMCA you have probably achieved too little to understand that the differences usually don’t matter.
As Jerry Weinberg said, “Don’t take your models too seriously.”
And that also applies to this blog post.
Reducing variety is often not the right approach when trying to handle the complexity of…
People's behaviors depend on the environment. If you manipulate the environment, you manipulate behaviors. Agile…
The hardest part of becoming Agile is changing the behavior of other people. (At least,…
People don’t bother with understanding. Really, they don’t. When I tweet something like “Maybe it’s…
Sometimes I hate it when I keep receiving new requests for any of the systems…
My new little book How to Change the World is being translated into Japanese and…
My little self-published book How to Change the World is being translated into eleven languages.…
Today I counted no less than four new initiatives promoted by our employees: A business…
No matter how big the CEO’s desk is, an organization is not a hierarchy. It…
When you're managing software development projects, you need to know the difference between complex and…
After hands on experience with these (ignore YMCA for the moment) on actual projects where you were accountable for the outcomes, which would you prefer to use if you came to a project where they were already in place?
I’d say work with the model that people are already using, if it works for them. If there’s a problem with the model, change it by borrowing from another.
Have you personally used any of those models and found ways to make improvements?
Both PDCA and Build-Measure-Learn have worked fine for me. Often more intuitively than explicitly. Found no need to change them.
PDCA vs. PDSA vs. OODA vs. BML vs. PSR vs. YMCA – Agile Management | NOOP.NL