Oh, how we love discussions about terminology…
Is my course about go to site
native american essay
online viagra no prescription
online essay scoring
essay writing services usa
sildenafil (viagra) vardenafil (levitra) and tadalafil (cialis)
viagra hmo california
research and writing services
what to write a college essay on
thesis led argument led
go to site
normal blood sugar when on prednisone
sample psychology essay
dissertation writing services usa
how to get my business email on iphone
sample survey cover letter questionnaire
pay to do journalism case study
what is similar to viagra
diversity essay medical school
management or leadership?
Are the problems we discuss complex or complicated?
Do the teams need coaches or mentors?
Should they have responsibility or accountability?
Are we being agile or lean?
The discussions about terminology go on and on. Yes, I’ve been guilty about this too. I love a good fight about a few letters, every now and then. 🙂
But does it matter?
After more than a decade we should know that we can make good progress in our work despite uncertainty, fuzzy boundaries, diverse opinions, and minimal definitions.
We can go on forever trying to find the “right” specifications for our most cherished words. But maybe we should stop splitting hairs over terminology and go and produce something.
Ah! But if we produce things… should we then aim for output or outcome?
Agile Management - Complexity Thinking View more presentations from Jurgen Appelo.
Here's my latest presentation (that I'm still working on). It is called Complexity Thinking. I…
A software project is a network of people, interacting together for their own purposes. We…
Ernst & Young recently “discovered” that employees will resort to corruption and fraud when they…
This is the presentation I made for the LESS2010 conference in Helsinki. I will repeat…
You’re not a complexity thinker when… you claim your interpretation of complexity is correct, while…
I appreciate the importance of catalyzing each other’s performance in an organization, and I think…
I think I had some sort of a breakthrough idea today! It happened just over…
I know. I have not been very kind to systems thinking in my recent “Complexity…
While the experts are battling over each others’ ideas, I remind myself that all models…
It’s correct, sometimes you should just defer those academic discussions. But be careful not to skip the necessary definition of the domain language! Being fuzzy when calling your business objects something they are not can lead to big problems while or after developing the software. However, I don’t think you meant to defer domain terminology :).
Yes, it matters.
From Cynefin perspective there is a huge difference between complex and complicated. The literally mean different things and we need different tools in each domain. So this is really about being clear on what it is that we mean.
Agile and Lean imply very different cultures.
Personal responsibility is a key ingredient for success. Accountability is to others – this is important but less valuable.
I would suggest that we need to have an explicit, describable understanding what we are doing in order to evolve what we are doing.
There are no objective definitions of what these words mean. The (commonly used) meaning of the word management has slowly changed over the years. Lyssa Adkins gives a different meaning to mentors/coaches in her book than I do in my book. And scientists don’t even agree how to measure complexity.
In the end it is important to understand each other, also when we disagree. It much less important to define exactly what the words mean.