In modern businesses managers are expected to be "servant leaders" and "systems thinkers". But nobody…
Is it a method? Is it a framework?
No, it’s… what actually?
In two previous posts I claimed that Management 1.0 is doing the wrong thing, while Management 2.0 is doing the right thing wrong. Now you probably expect me to say, “Management 3.0 is doing the right thing”.
But what is the “right thing”?
Some of my friends prefer organic food over factory food.
I respect their opinion that eating organic food is for them the right thing to do. Choosing organic food over mass-produced food is not a method. It’s not a framework. It’s not a religion. It’s a way of life. It’s what my friends believe is right.
Doing “the right thing” means acting in a way that is consistent with a core belief.
My core belief is that organizations are complex adaptive systems, and that managers must care for the system, instead of bossing people around. Others have phrased it differently:
Organizations are learning networks of diverse people creating value. […] The role of leaders includes stewardship of the living rather than management of the machine.
I cannot prove any of this. But I believe this to be true.
This means I think…
There are many ways to do this.
Everyone can come up with useful practices that satisfy these criteria. Management 3.0 is not defined by practices, such as the delegation levels, moving motivators, or the change management questions. These models and exercises are just examples of things you can do to become a healthier organization. Just like drinking ecological coffee, and not eating junk food, are merely examples of becoming a more “organic-minded” person.
Eating organic food is not a framework, and not a method. It is a way of life.
Management 3.0 is not a framework, and not a method. It is a way of work.
And yes, I believe Management 3.0 is a “right thing” to do.